WHAT ARE THESE SUPREME PROHIBITIVE LAWS OF THE LAND?
UNDER A STANDING FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST 5 USC 552,
WHY DOESN'T AMERICA KNOW? WHEN DID THESE LAWS END?
When the law ends, tyranny begins. John Locke
"Liberty
is the proper end and object of authority."
John Winthrop 12-term Governor
of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Our Nation's Archive © 1999 page
47
BIBLE, Hosea 4:6 MY PEOPLE ARE DESTROYED
FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE...
BIBLE, JOHN 8:32 AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH
AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE”
JAMES RICHARD
MICHAEL ORGERON
Created Easter Sunday April 23, 2000 in the year
of the Dragon, without prejudice in its entirety,
UCC 1-207. Young at Heart,
I Dare to Dream. Born in New Orleans Louisiana Sept. 1952, Year of
the Dragon, a Virgo
The greatest gift that one generation
can give to the next is a reverence for the past to ensure the future.
"Attainder or Outlawing"
The Right to keep and bear Arms
was ATTAINED in Germany by registration and confiscation. Jews were
ATTAINED in Egypt and Germany. American Indians were ATTAINED and
removed to Reservations. African Americans who could not own guns
were ATTAINED and enslaved, when they escaped they were OUTLAWED, and returned
by Fugitive Slave Act. Confederate Soldiers and Communists were ATTAINED,
BLACKLISTED and Denied Work. Japanese Americans were ATTAINED and
placed into American CONCENTRATION camps during World War II.
Taxpayers are ATTAINED, when they withhold payments, they are OUTLAWED.
Tyrannical Communist Regimes ATTAIN and Prohibit Free Speech and Fair Trials.
Noncustodial Parents are ATTAINED, OUTLAWED, BLACKLISTED, ENSLAVED and
returned to the service of their Custodial Parents by a New Fugitive Slave
Act, the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act. Custodial Parents have
ATTAINED Titles of Nobility, Preferment of Court & Slaves.
FOR A BLACK AND WHITE COPY EMAIL
jimo9@earthlink.net
"We the People of the United States in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare and secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and Our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"
BIBLE, II CORINTHIANS 3:6 ...not the letter,
but the spirit; for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
(*1)
Written and Published under the Protection of U.S. Const. Amend I . Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the FREE EXERCISE thereof; or abridging the Freedom Speech or of the Press or the Right of the People peaceably to assemble and Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances.
Our Constitution was written under
the COMMON LAW precepts of LIFE & LIBERTY, as identified in the Declaration
of Independence, which prohibited the GOVERNMENT from issuing EX POST FACTO
PRETEND LEGISLATION, UNWARRANTABLE JURISDICTIONS, Victimless Crimes or
otherwise known as OUTLAWING, ATTAINDER or PRETEND OFFENSES (COLORABLE
CRIMES) "BILLS of ATTAINDER." The Nobility of the King's Court was
notorious for "ATTAINING" anyone or anything, as the King so ORDERED with
many INNOCENTS suffering "ATTAINDER." A CRIME causes
an actual injury to another person's Life or Liberty. There must
be a COMPLAINT of an ACTUAL INJURED PARTY, a real INJURY, a real
CRIME. SIMPLY stated under the U.S. Constitution you are at
LIBERTY to do whatever you want as long as you DO NOT HURT anyone else.
This is Supported by the U.S. Criminal Code Title 18 § 241,
242 prohibiting the Government or anyone from conspiring to or violating
any American State Citizen under the Color of Law, PRETEND LEGISLATION.
Do this, don't do that or we the government will "ATTAIN" you, fine you
or throw you into PRISON, "ATTAINDER." NO ONE
can GUARANTEE HAPPINESS so ONLY the "PURSUIT" of HAPPINESS was GUARANTEED.
ONLY THE LIE OF COMMUNISM CAN FALSELY PROMISE HAPPINESS, WHICH OTHERS
ARE COMPELLED TO PROVIDE UNDER TYRANNY. COMMUNISM submits to the
Natural Corrupt Liberties of Man BEARING FLASE WITNESS AGAINST HIS HEIGHBOR
TO "ATTAIN," COVET or STEAL HIS NEIGHBOR'S LIBERTY {time, money, rights
or property).
The greatest gift that one generation
can give to the next is a reverence for the past to ensure the future.
YOU might ask, why I cite the BIBLE in my work? Well I will allow PUBLIC LAW 97-280 to explain: 97th Congress; 96 STAT. 1211; S.J. Res. 165. WHEREAS the Bible the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people...as in the words of President Jackson that the Bible is "the ROCK on which our REPUBLIC rest."...Resolved by the Senate and House of Representative of the United States assembled, That the President is authorized and requested to designate 1983 as a national YEAR of the Bible in recognition of both the formative influence the Bible has been for our Nation, and our national need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures. Approved Oct. 4, 1982 Additionally Congress issued the first school book, the BIBLE.
Under the FALSE Premise of "total" SEPARATION of CHURCH and STATE (Communism?) barring any religion from FREE EXERCISE of their FAITH anywhere, the GOVERNMENT ILLEGALLY ESTABLISHES Atheism as the OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT Religion, thereby ATTAINING the FREE EXERCISE of most all other RELIGIONS. The BIBLE is a LEGAL resource used by judges and several copies exist in the FIFTH Circuit Court of Appeals Law Library. According to the clerk these BIBLE[S] are used by the Court of Appeals in determination of cases.
BIBLE, JOHN 17:17 SANCTIFY THEM THROUGH THY TRUTH: THY WORD IS TRUTH. (*1)
William Penn, "Those people who are not governed by God will be ruled by tyrants." (*2)
Directly above the Chief Justice's Chair is a tablet Signifying the TEN COMMANDMENTS. When the Speaker of the House looks up, his eyes look directly into the face of Moses. (*1) The Supreme legislator of the universe ONLY has TEN COMMANDMENTS contained in One Volume the Bible or TWO Tablets. Henry David Thoreau, "I heartily accept the motto, That government is best which governs least."
BIBLE, JAMES 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deeds. (*1)
BIBLE, II CORINTHIANS 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is LIBERTY. (*1)
Federalist 78 Para 8 & 9, Hamilton: For I agree that "there is no liberty if the power of the judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers." The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified EXCEPTIONS to legislative authority; such as it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights and privileges would amount to nothing.
"To embarrass justice by a multiplicity of laws, or to hazard it by confidence in judges, are the opposite rocks on which all civil institutions have been wrecked." Johnson-- engraved in Minnesota State Capitol, Outside the Supreme Court Chambers. (*2)
"The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge... The Jury has an unreviewable and unreversable power...to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by a trial judge..." (emphasis added) U.S. v. Dougherty, 473 F.2nd 1113, 1139 (1972) (*2)
GOVERNMENT at all levels defending its natural corrupt liberties will suffer the loss of power and may NOT be willing to ENDURE THE LEAST RESTRAINT OF OUR MOST JUST AUTHORITY, the SUPREME PROHIBITIONS of CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. So it may be up to the PEOPLE on JURY DUTY, VOTING, LOBBYING and WORD of MOUTH to Spread the MESSAGE of LIBERTY.
THERE IS A TWO FOLD LIBERTY (1)Natural Liberty common to man and beast is incompatible and inconsistent with authority, and cannot endure the least RESTRAINT of the most just authority. (2)Civil or Federal Liberty it may also be termed Moral Liberty in reference to the covenant between God and man, in the moral...and the politic covenants and constitutions, amongst men themselves. This Liberty is the proper end and object of authority, and cannot subsist without it; and it is a liberty to that only, which is good, just and honest, This liberty you are to stand for, with the hazard of your lives, if need be. John Winthrop 12 term governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in about 1645 speech. Our Nation's Archive © 1999 pg 47
The greatest gift that one generation can give to the next is a reverence for the past to ensure the future.
I highly recommend the following for their
OUTSTANDING Contributions, but allow everyone their own beliefs and preferences:
(*1) The Rainbow Study Bible, King James
Version Bold Letter Edition © 1996
Rainbow Studies Inc.; El Reno, Oklahoma 73036;
USA
(*2) CITIZENS RULE BOOK, a.k.a. Jury Handbook
Whitten Printers; 1001 S. 5th St., Phonix, AZ
85004 (602) 258-6406
FULLY INFORMED
JURY ASSOCIATION http://www.fija.org/
(*3) Our Nation's Archive, The History
of the United States in Documents © 1999
Published by Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers,
Inc.;151 West 19th Street, New York 10011
Distributed by Workman Publishing Company; 708
Broadway, New York, NY 10003
(*4) U.S. CONSTITUTION FOR EVERYONE ©
1987 (28th printing)
A Perigee Book published by The Berkley Publishing
Group; 200 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10016
(*5) The Federalist Papers, Hamilton, Madison,
Jay © 1961 (32nd printing)
Published by Penguin Books USA Inc.; 375 Hudson
Street; New York, NY 10014, USA
(*6) BLOND'S CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ©
1993
Sulzburger & Graham Publishing, Ltd. 800
366-7086
HOW DO PRIVATE OR SPECIAL INTEREST EXIST, ETHICALLY?
DISCLAIMER: A government that does NOT honor one law may NOT honor any law.
"Liberty is the proper end and object of authority"
OUTLAWING AND FORCE ARE THE TOOL OF TYRANTS
THIS IS NOT AN INDICTMENT OF ANYONE, BUT IDENTIFIES THE MOST IMPORTANT PROHIBITIONS OF WE THE PEOPLE'S LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
United States Code of Ethics for Government Service Make no private promises of any office, since a government employee has no private word, which can be binding upon Public duty. Displayed in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the John Minor Wisdom Building. Federalist 10 & 51
OUR U.S. Constitution is the Oldest Written Constitution in the world, note Professor Judith A. Best, created a democratic Federal Republic: "We are NOT, NEVER have been, and were NOT intended to be a simple democracy, because a simple democracy is a form of tyranny --- a majority tyranny." (*4)
Federalist 51 In a society under the forms of which the stronger faction can readily unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy may as truly be said to reign, as in a state of nature where the weaker individual is not secure against the violence of the stronger.
Dictators "hold power" by exploiting human differences
and DESTROYING human lives. President William Jefferson Clinton 11-23-99,
Channel 22 News About 8:10 AM MST
History tells us that bad people with bad motives
always attack things of value. President William Jefferson Clinton 2-11-00,
responding to E business attacks on the Internet.
The Whim of the KING (DICTATOR) "ATTAINDER" is the main reason our United States Constitution was written TO PREVENT ARBITRARY, INCONSISTENT, TYRANNICAL, DESPOTIC GOVERNMENT ACTS . WHENEVER any GOVERNMENT ENTITY ATTAINS the "RIGHT to SAY WHAT THE LAW IS" with TOTAL IMMUNITY ", then that ENTITY has "ATTAINED" the status of SOVEREIGN, DICTATOR or KING, EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED by THE NO TITLES OF NOBILITY CLAUSE. IT DOES NOT MATTER if ILLEGAL AUTHORITY was ATTAINED by FORCE or GRADUAL ATTAINMENT. The RESULT IS THE SAME.
NO
TITLE OF NOBILITY http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1841.ZC.html
515 U.S. 200 (1995) No. 93-1841 No
ATTAINDER of a debtor race, therefore no easily identified debtor person
or group. i.e. race, taxpayer, religion or parent?
Precedence,
Preferment and Attainder http://www.ren.dm.net/compendium/22.html
DICTATORS COME TO POWER BY INCITING THE DOMESTIC INSURRECTION OF MAJORITY FACTIONS, MAKING PROMISES TO A MAJORITY OF PEOPLE. WHEN THE DICTATOR MOVES TO GRANT THESE PROMISES, HE IS LOVED AND PROTECTED BY HIS PEOPLE, THE MAJORITY FACTIONS, MOB RULE, A PURE DEMOCRACY. DICTATORS BUY THEIR POWER BY STEALING THE MONEY AND PROPERTY OF THE OPPRESSED MINORITIES TO GIVE TO HIS PEOPLE.
Federalist Papers 83 Hamilton
Paragraph 16 Cl. 2
Willful abuses of a public authority, to the
oppression of the subject, and every species of Official Extortion,
are offenses against the government, for which the persons who commit
them may be indicted and punished according to the circumstances of the
case.
ADOLPH HITLER WAS LOVED BY THE GERMAN PEOPLE. HITLER GOT THINGS DONE. HIS IMMORAL ORDERS WERE FOLLOWED TO THE LETTER OF HIS LAW. THOSE THAT FOLLOWED HIS ORDERS WERE SENTENCED TO BE HANGED BY THE NUREMBURG TRIALS, WHO CITED "A HIGHER AUTHORITY" BEFORE ANYONE ENFORCE IMMORAL ORDERS.
DICTATORS ARE DANGEROUS BECAUSE THEY CAN ARBITRARILY OR INCONSISTENTLY SAY WHAT THE LAW IS, THEN ARBITRARILY ENFORCE THE LAW. DICTATORS GET THINGS DONE. THE IS A SIMPLE DEFINITION OF A TYRANT OR DESPOT.
OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC GUARANTEES EQUAL PROTECTION WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. NO ARBITRARY INCONSISTENT DISCRIMINATION, "NO ATTAINDER." ALL ARE EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW. OUR CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN TO BIND THE HANDS OF WOULD BE DICTATORS, WHO NEED TO GET THINGS DONE, THEREBY IMPAIRING THE FAST TRACK TO TYRANNY.
PEOPLE WHO HAVE SURVIVED A DICTATORIAL REGIME KNOW ALL TO WELL WHAT A DICTATOR IS ALL ABOUT. ASK ANY SURVIVOR OF THE HOLOCAUST, A SURVIVOR OF DELIBERATE STARVATION IN RUSSIA OR ANY CUBAN IMMIGRANT.
WHAT PART OF "NO" DOESN'T THE GOVERNMENT
UNDERSTAND?
NO NOBILITY, THEREFORE NO ATTAINDER;
NO BILLS OF ATTAINDER; AND NO BILLS
OF CREDIT
BIBLE, Hosea 4:6 MY PEOPLE ARE DESTROYED FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE...
WHY is it then, that MOST AMERICANS
and MOST LAWYERS "DO NOT KNOW" what: NO TITLE of NOBILITY, therefore NO
ATTAINDER; NO Bill of Attainder; NO Bill of Pains and Penalties; or NO
Bills of Credit ARE? Why are these definitions so OBSCURE?
OR have we just forgotten? U.S. Const Art. I Sec. 9 & 10.
BIBLE, JOHN 17:17 SANCTIFY THEM THROUGH
THY TRUTH: THY WORD IS TRUTH.
BIBLE, JOHN 3:20-21 FOR EVERY ONE THAT
DOETH EVIL HATETH THE LIGHT, NEITHER COMETH TO THE LIGHT, LEST HIS DEEDS
SHOULD BE REPROVED. BUT HE THAT DOETH TRUTH COMETH TO LIGHT,
THAT HIS DEEDS MAY BE MADE MANIFEST, THAT THEY ARE WROUGHT GOD.
The SUPREME COURTS AUTHORITY ONLY in DEFENSE
of the Constitution, which is "We the People," Liberty the proper
end and object of Authority, which is the "Spirit and Scope" of the Constitution,
WHENEVER any American Citizen or group of American Citizens are Challenging
the Government's Authority.
Federalist Papers James Madison
No. 44 § 1. Paragraph 5
Bills of Attainder, ex post facto laws,
and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the
first principles of the social compact and to every principle of sound
legislation. The two former are
expressly prohibited...and all of them are prohibited by the SPIRIT
and SCOPE of these fundamental charters. Our own experiences have
nevertheless taught us that additional FENCES against these dangers
ought NOT be omitted. [EXPANDS the SPIRIT and SCOPE of said PROHIBITIONS]
JURY checks GOVERNMENT and COURT checks Majority
Oppressions.
THE SUPREME COURT'S AUTHORITY. Blond's Constitutional
Law © 1993 Excerpt.
II. REVIEW OF CONGRESSIONAL ACTS.
A. Maybury v. Madison established the doctrine
of judicial review:
the Supreme Court is the ultimate interperter of
the Constitution for the coordinate branches of Government.
B. The Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized the
Supreme Court to issue writs of Mandamus (an order to compel an official
to perform a duty) to persons holding office under U.S. authority.
{We the People's Authority, the Constitution} According to Chief Justice
Marshal (the first Chief Justice), this statute was at odds with
Art III, § 2 of the Constitution, which only granted the Supreme Court
original jurisdiction in certain types of cases. The Federal statute
therefore unconstitutional because the issuance of writs of mandamus in
this type of case fell outside the purview of Article III.
C. As a species of law, the Constitution is within
the province of the Judiciary. The Constitution is also the Supreme
Law of the Land, and the Supreme Court like other judges are constitutionally
bound to protect that supremacy. Any statue at variance with the
Constitution is therefore null and void Article VI.
D. The judicial branch of the government has
a duty and power to declare WHAT THE LAW IS. Maybury v. Madison.
The Supreme Court has the authority to declare a statue unconstitutional
and refuse to apply it.
III. REVIEW OF STATE LAWS. Article VI establishes
that the "Constitution, and the laws of the United States...made in Pursuance
thereof; and all treaties made...under the authority of the United States,
shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every state shall
be bound thereby..." Thus, state court judges must follow the U.S.
Constitution, even when state laws conflict with it. The Supreme
Court's power to assess the constitutionality of state legislation logically
extends from its role as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" Maybury v. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
Liberty the proper end and
object of authority ALWAYS places the burden of proof on the Government.
CONSTANT Writ of Mandamus.
DOES NOT COVER: NO TITLES OF NOBILITY, NO BILLS OF PAINS AND PENALTIES OR NO BILLS OF CREDIT. WHY?
FORTUNATELY THESE EXPRESSED CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITIONS of LIMITED GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY eliminate MOST of the FEARED DANGERS of a TYRANNICAL DICTATORIAL GOVERNMENT:
AMERICA CANNOT SURVIVE WITH THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, ATTAINED.
NO PRESUMPTIONS OF GUILT AND NO STATE DEBTS
"NO" TITLES OF NOBILITY - THEREFORE "NO ATTAINDER" by ARBITRARY, INCONSISTENT or TYRANNICAL ACTS without FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS."NO" BILLS OF ATTAINDER - THEREFORE NO DEATH SENTENCES without FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS.
"NO" BILLS OF PAINS AND PENALTIES - THEREFORE NO FINES, PENALTIES or IMPRISONMENT without FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS.
"NO BILLS of CREDIT: NO STATE DEBTS. Alleged State debts may also be a PROHIBITED letter of Marquee and Reprisals.
THEREFORE NO ARBITRARY or INCONSISTENT ATTAINDER
OF PERSONS, PROPERTY, FACT, TRUTH, UNALIENABLE RIGHT, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT,
CIVIL RIGHT or GUILT without FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS. Reid v. Covert
354 US 1
NO OUTLAWING, NO LYNCHING, NO MOCK TRIALS, NO MOB RULE, NO PURE DEMOCRACY, NO RULE BY POLL, NO ATTAINDER BILLS, NO ATTAINDER LAWS, "NO COMPELLED" VOLUNTARY INCOME TAXES or SUPPORT, NO TRAFFIC TICKETS; NO SEIZURES of POWER, PERSONS, PROPERTY, FREE SPEECH, or PETITIONS for REDRESS of GRIEVANCES. Reid v. Covert 354 US 1
DUE PROCESS REQUIRES A TRUE VERDICT BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY, NOT a FRAUDULENT VERDICT by an ATTAINED or TAINTED JURY kept ignorant of their TRUE power or a JURY MOVING based on the DICTATORIAL EDICT of the JUDGE to say "what the law is". Reid v. Covert 354 US 1
THE JURY "We the People" THE ORIGINAL and FOURTH BRANCH of GOVERNMENT have the UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO OVERTURN BOTH LAW AND FACT IN CONTROVERSY. WE the PEOPLE SAY WHAT THE LAW IS and the THREE GOVERNMENTAL BRANCHES of OUR REPUBLIC are to provide "EQUAL PROTECTION" to ENSURE that NO SINGLE AMERICAN or GROUP is OPPRESSED by a MAJORITY. NO CLASS WARFARE, NO DISCRIMINATION. Federalist 10 & 51 James Madison, the Father of the Constitution.
Federalist 78 Para 8 & 9, Hamilton: For I agree that "there is no liberty if the power of the judging be Not separated from the legislative and executive powers." The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified EXCEPTIONS to legislative authority; such as it shall pass NO bills of attainder, NO ex post facto laws and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in NO other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights and privileges would amount to nothing. JURY checks GOVERNMENT and GOVERNMENT checks Majority Oppressions.
"The people are the Masters of both Congress and Courts, NOT to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!" Abraham Lincoln (*2)
"To embarrass justice by a multiplicity of laws, or to hazard it by confidence in judges, are the opposite rocks on which all civil institutions have been wrecked." Johnson-- engraved in Minnesota State Capitol, Outside the Supreme Court Chambers.(*2)
"The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge... The Jury has an unreviewable and unreversable power...to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by a trial judge..." (emphasis added) U.S. v. Dougherty, 473 F.2nd 1113, 1139 (1972) (*2)
Thomas Jefferson's Warnings: "The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislative and executive also in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic Branch....judges should be withdrawn from the bench whose erroneous biases are leading us to dissolution. It may, indeed, injure them in fame or fortune; but it saves the Republic..." (*2)
"Liberty is the proper end and object of government" John Winthrop. (*3) But when you call one to be a magistrate, he doth not profess nor understand to have sufficient skill for that office, nor can you furnish him with gifts, etc; therefore you must run the hazard of his skills and ability. But if he fails in faithfulness, which by his oath he is bound unto, that he must answer for...
"Rulers have no authority from God to do mischief" Jonathan Mayhew advocated the theories British Philosopher John Locke. Mayhew affirmed the right of people to overthrow a tyrannical government. He speaks here to the duty of individual citizens to preserve their rights in the face of despotic rulers. "It is universally better to obey God than man when the laws of God and man clash and interfere with one another..."Rulers have no authority from God to do mischief"...It is a blasphemy to call tyrants and oppressors God's Ministers. No Rulers are properly God's ministers but such as are "just, ruling in the fear of God." When once magistrates act contrary to their office, and the end of their institution -- when they rob and ruin the public, instead of being guardians of its peace and welfare -- they immediately cease to be the ordinance and ministers of God, and no more deserve that glorious character than common pirates and highwaymen. If magistrates are unrighteous...the main end of civil government will be frustrated.
To be LEGAL, any law, rule, order or government act, MUST be CONSTITUTIONAL. But WHAT if the GOVERNMENT DOES NOT know OR is Deliberately IGNORING an EXPRESSED PROHIBITIONS of LIMITED AUTHORITY?
FRAUD: is the misrepresentation of a fact; suppression of a fact; the misrepresentation of a fact by failing to disclose, remaining, silent a FRAUD BY OMISSION; or Fraud by DELAY.
U.S. v Throckmorton 98 US 61 p65 Fraud vitiates
the consent of the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments.
Nuda v. Burrows Fraud destroys the validity of
everything into which it enters.
“All laws which are repugnant to the constitution
are NULL and Void.” Maybury v. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution
are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate
them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 p.491.
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers
no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protections; it creates no
office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never
been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425 p.442
“No one is bound to obey any unconstitutional
law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177; late
2d, Sec 256
Ask YOURSELF, DO you have any Idea, what a BILL of ATTAINDER may be? How about ATTAINDER?
BIBLE, JOHN 3:21 BUT HE THAT DOETH TRUTH COMETH TO LIGHT...
James Madison was Convinced that "most of our political evils may be traced to our commercial ones," and Hamilton ...asking all 13 states to...May 1787 to "take into consideration the trade and commerce of the United States" (*4) THE COMMERCE CLAUSE.
A Law should be MORAL, for the good of Society.
Why is it that Most believe as did Our Forefathers that the TEN COMMANDMENTS
were the Best RULES for SOCIETY ever Written? ITs because they are SELF-EVIDENT
TRUTHS.
I will Mention ONLY a few here to support my
point. BIBLE, EXODUS 20:15-17
THOU SHALT NOT STEAL.OUR U.S. Constitution is the Oldest Written Constitution in the world, notes Professor Judith A. Best, created a democratic Federal Republic: "We are NOT, NEVER have been, and were NOT intended to be a simple democracy, because a simple democracy is a form of tyranny --- a majority tyranny." (*4)THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST THY NEIGHBOUR
THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOUR'S HOUSE, THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOUR'S WIFE, NOR HIS MANSERVANT, NOR HIS MAIDSERVANT, NOR HIS ASS, NOR ANYTHING THAT IS THY NEIGHBOUR'S. [includes his Liberty, time, money, rights or property]
CURRENTLY IN AMERICAN POLITICS:
The CONSERVATIVE "ATTAINS" his PROVISIONS (PROFITS from his LABOR) but is willing to SHARE, "VOLUNTARILY." AMERICAN VIRTUE, CHARITYFederalist Papers James Madison No. 44 § 1. Paragraph 5The LIBERAL (Special Interest) DEMANDS a UNEARNED SHARE to "ATTAIN OTHER PEOPLES MONEY" for WHATEVER REASON BEARING FALSE WITNESS AGAINST his NEIGHBOUR the CONSERVATIVES. COMMUNIST EVIL, COVETOUSNESS, STEALING
MOST ALL APPROPRIATION BILLS [OTHER PEOPLES MONEY], "BILLS OF ATTAINDER" ARE THE EVIL COMMUNISTIC "COMMERCIAL" TRANSFER of WEALTH. PLANK TWO OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO is a HEAVY PROGRESSIVE INCOME TAX
WHEN THE GOVERNMENT USES MANDATORY MEASURES "OUTLAWING" or "ECONOMIC WARFARE" TO TRANSFER WEALTH "ATTAINDER, YOUR NOT PAYING YOUR FAIR SHARE", IT IS MOVING UNDER A EVIL FOREIGN COMMUNIST LIE TO STEAL. THREATS MAKE IT EXTORTION, ROBBERY and ECONOMIC WARFARE. SUBSEQUENT DISTRIBUTION or COMMERCIAL PAYMENT TO THE NOBILITY the COMMUNISTIC LIBERAL, BECOMES BRIBERY FOR THE SUPPORT OF MOB RULE AND POWER. The POLITICIAN CALLS IT BRINGING HOME THE BACON, FUNDING or APPROPRIATIONS.
TO make it easier to COLLECT the HEAVY INCOME TAXES, the GOVERNMENT DIRECTS the EMPLOYER TO WITHHOLD "ATTAIN" WAGES, a "BILL OF ATTAINDER", IMPAIRING THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRACT, who is REQUIRED to pay the FULL AMOUNT DUE to the EMPLOYEE, impairing the obligations of the employment contract.
Bill
of Attainder Project http://www.isc-durant.com
EXPANDS the SPIRIT and SCOPE of the EXPRESSED
PROHIBITIONS.
Tech
Law Journal Bill of Attainder http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/attainder.htm
LIMITS the SPIRIT and SCOPE of the EXPRESSED
PROHIBITIONS.
The
Catholic Encyclopedia, Attainder http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02059c.htm
Historical accounting of Bills of Attainder.
Dictators "hold power" by exploiting human differences
and DESTROYING human lives. President William Jefferson Clinton 11-23-99,
Channel 22 News About 8:10 AM MST
History tells us that bad people with bad motives
always attack things of value. President William Jefferson Clinton 2-11-00,
responding to E business attacks on the Internet.
The Whim of the KING (DICTATOR) "ATTAINDER" is the main reason our United States Constitution was written TO PREVENT ARBITRARY, INCONSISTENT, TYRANNICAL, DESPOTIC GOVERNMENT ACTS . WHENEVER any GOVERNMENT ENTITY ATTAINS the "RIGHT to SAY WHAT THE LAW IS" with TOTAL IMMUNITY ", then that ENTITY has "ATTAINED" the status of SOVEREIGN, DICTATOR or KING, EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED by THE NO TITLES OF NOBILITY CLAUSE. IT DOES NOT MATTER if ILLEGAL AUTHORITY was ATTAINED by FORCE or GRADUAL ATTAINMENT. The RESULT IS THE SAME.
NO
TITLE OF NOBILITY http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1841.ZC.html
515 U.S. 200 (1995) No. 93-1841
Precedence,
Preferment and Attainder http://www.ren.dm.net/compendium/22.html
NOBILITY or DICTATORS are DANGEROUS because their OPINIONS COULD NOT BE QUESTIONED and were ENFORCED by PAID PROTECTION. DOES this SOUND like our Government, as it has EVOLVED.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN the THREE BRANCHES of GOVERNMENT: the CONGRESS; the EXECUTIVE; or the JUDICIARY believe they have the RIGHT to SAY WHAT THE LAW IS, with IMMUNITY. Then THEY ALL have set themselves ABOVE the LAW COMMITTING A VERY SERIOUS ILLEGAL BREACH of THEIR SWORN OATH OF OFFICE.
There IS NO IMMUNITY for WILLFUL IMMORAL ABUSE of Public Authority.
Federalist Papers 83 Hamilton
Paragraph 16 Cl. 2
Willful abuses of a public authority, to the
oppression of the subject, and every species of Official Extortion,
are offenses against the government, for which the persons who commit
them may be indicted and punished according to the circumstances of the
case.
WE THE PEOPLE's CONSTITUTION created THREE BRANCHES of GOVERNMENT. Checks and Balances to PROTECT us from any ABUSIVE GOVERNMENT ACTS. WE the People as the ORIGINAL AND FOURTH BRANCHES CHECKING LIMITED GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY with the JURY, the VOTE and WE the PEOPLE's CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT. FOUR Major CHECKS and BALANCES originating and ending with We the People.
Our CONSCIENCE the JURIES Free Will is being ATTAINED by WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE or by DIRECTIVE. Our ELECTIONS are ATTAINED by the PROMISES of BRIBES of OTHER PEOPLES MONEY.
It is WE the PEOPLE's SOVEREIGN RIGHT to say WHAT the LAW IS, NOT A pure DEMOCRACY, but a REPUBLIC with the GOVERNMENT insuring NO INDIVIDUAL or GROUP would be "ATTAINED" or ABUSED by MOB RULE. THE INTENT OF OUR GUARANTEED FORM OF GOVERNMENT, a REPUBLIC.
We the PEOPLE in ORDER TO MAINTAIN our SOVEREIGN CONTROL and WATCHFUL eye on OUR GOVERNMENT provided that IN ALL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, THE ACCUSED SHALL ENJOY THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL, BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY..., thereby preventing unknown secret illegal government persecutions or activity. The minute Free Speech is Suppressed, the VERDICT is TAINTED or ATTAINED a MISTRIAL.
On July 28, 1999 a FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE,
a Constitutional Lawyer stated that I made many arguments NOT yet addressed
by the U.S. Supreme Court, but she could NOT allow me to make those arguments
before a JURY. I Stated For the RECORD, that I
had trouble finding an UNDERSTANDABLE DEFINITION OF a BILL of ATTAINDER.
The Judge smiled and stated that, "the law is that way." I further
stated that I had finally found UNDERSTANDABLE definition[s] in the
PUBLIC LIBRARY in a very OLD 1957 Webster's Dictionary identifying the
Indictment as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: a Bill of Attainder; a Bill of Pains and
Penalties; and a Bill of Credit
FEDERALIST 44 "ADDITIONAL FENCES
AGAINST THESE DANGERS OUGHT NOT BE OMITTED"
OUR FOREFATHERS saw Bills of ATTAINDER and Bills Of Pains and Penalties
as DANGERS, but yet we don't even know what they are. AGAIN, WHY
NOT????
According to my findings: Attainder; Bills of Attainder; Bills of Pains and Penalties; or Bills of Credit are UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The Constitution was written to PRESERVE LIBERTY and JUSTICE for ALL, NOT to CREATE a GOVERNMENT of NOBILITY (OFFICIALS) whose PAID PROTECTION insures their IMMUNITY as they ATTAIN the wealth of the PRODUCTIVE CITIZENS by means of ECONOMIC WARFARE to pay BRIBES to OTHERS, especially Majorities or Special Interest.
Confirmed - Cooper v. Aaron, By Chief Justice
Earl Warren
No state, legislator, executive or judicial officer
can "War" against
(or
test the limitations of) the Constitution
without violating their undertaking to support it (Breach of Oath/Contract,
Treason??). The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice
under law. The Fourteenth Amendment embodied and emphasized that ideal...no
State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection
of the laws. Our constitutional ideal of equal justice under law is thus
made a living truth. (Book, Our Nation's Archive © 1999 pg 701)
Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language Copyright © 1957.
FOR A BLACK AND WHITE COPY EMAIL jimo9@earthlink.net
Attain-to gain possession of, acquire; to fasten guilt upon; to convict to condemn (ordered to pay?)
Attainder - OF ataindre to accuse or convict. 1.) Act of attaining. Or the state of being attained; extincting of civil rights and capacities of a person consequent upon sentence of death or outlawry; as an act of attainder. Formerly attainder was inseparable consequence of a judicial or legislative sentence for treason or felony, and involved the forfeiture or escheat of all the real and personal property of the condemned person, and such “corruption of blood” that he could neither receive or transmit inheritance, nor could he sue or testify in any court, or claim any legal protection or rights. In England attainder upon judgment of treason or felony was completely abolished in 1870 (by 33 & 34 Vist c.20) and in the United States Constitution provides (Art. I Section 9 cl 3.) That no bill of attainder shall be passed; (Art. III Section 3) that no attainder of treason (in consequence of a judicial sentence) shall work corruption of the blood or forfeiture, except during the life of the person attained. A bill of attainder is a (judicial or) legislative act which inflicts the consequences of attainder upon a person without a judicial trial. Cf.. Outlawry, Forfeiture, Escheat. 2.) Results of attaining; dishonoring; condemnation.
Bill of Attainder-a bill or a statute attaining a person. SEE ATTAINDER 1.) & Baby Bell cases 154 F. 3d 226
Bill of Credit-1. Letter of Credit 2. U.S. Constitutional Law. A bill issued by a State involving the faith and credit of the State and designed to circulate as money on the Credit of the State. “No State shall...emit bills of credit.” U. S. Const. Art. I §10.
Bill of pains and penalties - (common law orgin) A legislative Act imposing upon those who have previously committed a certain act or acts punishment or disability by which the Act was not punishable at the time of its commission. Strictly the term includes a bill of attainder, but it is mostly used on bills imposing a penalty less than death. Cf.. Ex Post Facto.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary Copyright
© 1897 & 1914
ATTAINDER-In the United States, the doctrine
of Attainder is now scarcely known {WHY?}, although during and shortly
after the Revolution, acts of attainder were passed by several of the states.
The passage of such bills is expressly forbidden by the Constitution.
BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES - The clause
in the Constitution prohibiting bills of attainder prohibits bills of pains
and penalties.
Corpus Juris Secundum 7 Copyright
© 1980
Attainder-...the immediate inseparable
consequence of the common law...a mark of infamy by means of which the
offender becomes “attinctus” of “blackened” {BLACKLISTED} the singling
out of an individual for legislatively prescribed punishment.
"Blacklists
and Other Economic Sanctions" http://dept.english.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/schrecker-blacklist.html
from:
Ellen Schrecker, THE AGE OF MCCATHYISM: A BRIEF HISTORY WITH DOCUMENTS.
(Boston: St. Martins's Press, 1994) documents how people lost their jobs,
with redress and passports denied. Domestic violence agaisnt
Americans in the form of economic warfare.
16A C.J.S. § 429 D. BILLS
OF ATTAINDER,
Constitutional Law, Punishment imposed by court
cannot be a Bill of Attainder. p384
Encyclopedia Britanica ©
1974
attainder...the dominant faction (mob
rule,
illegal democracy?) of the legislature could make any past conduct that
it found offensive into a crime... {"OUTLAWING"}
BIBLE, JOHN 8:32 AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE”
The greatest gift that one generation can give to the next is a reverence for the past to ensure the future.
STRUGGLES OF THE FUTURE ARE RESOLVED AND PREVENTED
BY PROBLEMS OF THE PAST.
THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO
REPEAT IT!
HISTORY REVISITED
Our Nation's Archive © 1999
The History of the United States in Documents
"Liberty is the proper end and object of authority"
"Be upon our guard against power"
This CASE is the personification
of We the People's Power, the JURY
"Rulers have no authority from God to do mischief"
Federalist 51: On the Safety of
Multiple Interest, Concluding Federalist 10
James Madison known as the Father of the Constitution.
In the Federalist papers, madison wrote extensively on the balance of power
and the role of faction in democracy. Rather than trying to snuff
different interest, he sought to control them through a system of checks
and balances in the governmental framework.
First - In the Compound Republic
of America, the power surrendered by the people (for the General Good)
is first divided between two distinct governments (State & Federal
Constitutions).
Second -
It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against
the oppression of its rulers, but to guard the society against the injustice
of the other part. (different or special interest). If a majority
be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure.
The second method will be exemplified in the
federal republic of the United States. In a free government, the
security of civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights.
Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society.
It ever has been, and ever will be pursued, until it be obtained, or until
liberty be lost in the pursuit. In a society under the forms of which
the stronger faction can readily unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy
may as truly be said to reign, as in a state of nature where the weaker
individual is not secure against the violence of the stronger.
Federalist 10: The Union as a Safeguard
Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
> From the New York Packet. Friday, November
23, 1787. MADISON To the People of the State of New York:
The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced
into public councils, have in truth been the mortal diseases under which
popular governments have everywhere perished;
By a faction, I understand a number of citizens,
whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united
and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse
to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interest
of the community.
The diversity in the faculties of men, from
which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle
to a uniformity of interest. The protection of these faculties is
the first object of government.
There are two methods of curing the mischiefs
of faction: the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling
its effects.
JURY checks GOVERNMENT and COURT checks Majority
Oppressions.
OUTLAWING, THE TOOL
OF TYRANTS
If anyone refused to give a KING anything
he wanted, he smiply OUTLAWED or "ATTAINED" you, off with his head, throw
him into the dungeon, 30 pieces of silver to betray him or 500 Dollars
Dead or Alive "Bills of Attainder." Pay this or pay that or else, is ATTAINDER
or a BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES.
To compel a man to furnish funds for propagation
of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. It is
error alone that needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.
Thomas Jefferson.
Civil Disobedience
"All of my sex are doomed to political subjection"
"Any person who displays a red flag is guilty of a felony"
Declaration of Conscience
"Patriotism is not the fear of something; it is the love of something"
"Have you no sense of decency, sir?"
Brown v. Board of Education: "Separate but equal has no place"
Cooper v. Aaron: "Equal justice under the law is thus made a living truth"
"William Jefferson Clinton is acquitted"
UNDER PRESIDENT Clinton's leadership many AMERICANS are being "convicted, turned into criminals, outlawed or ATTAINED" denied a fair TRIAL by impartial juries. Juries are not even allowed FAIR and REASONABLE consideration of the EVIDENCE, FACTS or the LAW, much less allowed to consider "jury nullification." DOESN'T SOUND like any AMERICAN EQUAL PROTECTION OR DUE PROCESS protection of LIBERTY, does it? One kind of Justice for Democratic Presidents and another kind of Justice for Republican Presidents and everyone else.
This 1950 Quote bares repeating by Maine Republican Senator Margaret Chase Smith. As an American, I am shocked at the way Republicans and Democrats alike are playing directly into the COMMUNIST DESIGN OF "CONFUSE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER"
ONE final QUESTION. Are we confused, divided
and conquered, living the communist, lie THE SUPREMACY OF THE STATE or
ARE WE AMERICA?
RETURN to HOME PAGE
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED FOR YOUR GRACIOUS CONSIDERATION.
James Richard Michael Orgeron May 1, 2000